This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This can range from minor adjustments to current procedures (such as adding a step to a team’s workflow) to successful workplace transformation in existing structures (like company culturechanges) or introducing new systems, software, or initiatives. Effective change implementation necessitates proficient change management.
When faced with an organization design challenge, many managers rush to grab a cocktail napkin—long the instrument of choice for reorganizing—and sketch out a high-level diagram of boxes and reporting relationships. What type of leadership and culture are required to achieve the value proposition?
We have seen this overwhelming anxiety and the corresponding drop in productivity in examples across industries during disruptive events like a merger or a reorganization because of the anxiety during these times of change. Leaders can help their team by reducing this noise.
Rather than following the usual model of keeping all information within a small decision-making team, the leader of the reorganization openly shared the rationale for making changes, the criteria by which decisions were made, and the broad timeline for execution.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 29,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content