Remove 2016 Remove Balance Sheet Remove Compensation
article thumbnail

Why Financial Statements Don’t Work for Digital Companies

Harvard Business Review

Similarly, Microsoft paid $26 billion for loss-making LinkedIn in 2016, and Facebook paid $19 billion for WhatsApp in 2014 when it had no revenues or profits. This becomes clear when you look at a company’s two most important financial statements: the balance sheet and the income statement.

article thumbnail

Inequality Isn’t Just Due to Market Forces — It’s Caused by Decisions the Boss Makes, Too

Harvard Business Review

Companies can be divided into two types , in terms of how they approach hiring and compensation: organizational oriented and market oriented. As my colleague Peter Cappelli recently argued , automation technologies are profitable, in part, because they are considered an asset on a firm’s balance sheet that can be depreciated.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

How Companies Can Use Investors to Their Advantage

Harvard Business Review

By 2016, the rise of smart phones seemed to have made the company less relevant: Its revenues were at almost the same level they had been a full decade earlier. It also called for streamlining headquarters and cutting executive management’s compensation. The number of directors and officers would be reduced.

article thumbnail

Corporations Weren’t Designed to Run on Code

Harvard Business Review

The strategy works, temporarily putting more cash on the positive side of the balance sheet. The speed and scale on which this is occurring helps us recognize that we are not in a cyclical downturn as corporations attempt to compensate for the disruptive impact of digital technology.

Assets 8